Culture – the way of life of a group of people passed down from one generation to the next through learning
Enculturation – learning our native culture(s) in childhood
Acculturation – adapting to another culture
Culture shock – the stress associated with acculturation

Saturday, June 28, 2008

UNHCR video week

I'm going on vacation today - weehee! Maruka and I are going to Bermuda, and we're very excited to report back about the cultural quirks of that little bit of the world. I'm especially excited because I know nothing about it - I know there's a triangle, and shorts, but that's about it.
So will I be blogging from the cruise ship? No. But there will still be new material on this blog thanks to blogger's many nifty features. Over the next week I'll be posting videos from the UNHCR You Tube channel. They're really well done, and as many of you know refugee issues are near and dear to my heart. Have a good week!

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Albania's sworn virgins

Fascinating article in the New York Times today about the Albanian "sworn virgin" tradition. According to Albanian custom, if the "patriarch" of a family dies without leaving a male heir, an unmarried (ie virginal) daughter or other relative can make an oath to remain a virgin for life and assume a male identity (though usually without changing her first name) and become the "man of the house," protecting and providing for the rest of the family. They live as men and are regarded as male by the rest of society, including other men.
The tradition of the sworn virgin can be traced to the Kanun of Leke Dukagjini, a code of conduct passed on orally among the clans of northern Albania for more than 500 years. Under the Kanun, the role of a woman is severely circumscribed: take care of children and maintain the home. While a woman’s life is worth half that of a man, a virgin’s value is the same: 12 oxen.
This is interesting on a number of levels. first, it implies (or so it seems to me) that women aren't inherently less capable than men since persons who are born women can fulfill male roles within society. Moreover, a woman doesn't lose her value until she becomes sexually active and a potential mother. This is different from other patriarchal models where virginity is valued because a woman becomes "ruined" by sex, and unfit for marriage to a different man, or where extramarital sex brings shame or dishonor onto her male relatives. This 2007 Washington Post article explains,
The idea that a woman would need to forsake love and live as a man to control her own fate seems primitive to modern eyes. But perhaps, in the context of a once-upon-a-time culture, a culture before feminism, it can be seen as progressive. The existence of sworn virgins reveals a cultural belief, however inchoate, that a biological woman can do all the work of a man.
Under this paradigm, biology may not be destiny but society is built around two completely separate gender roles. A person's gender role may usually be determined by biological sex, but that can be overridden by social imperatives.

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Multicultural NoVa

Loving this WaPo article about how the Muslim and Latino communities in NoVa are banding together. It just warms my heart, especially given all the anti-immigrant rhetoric and xenophobia we hear these days. What a great example of the salad-bowl theory of American acculturation (as opposed to the melting pot, which assumes that new arrivals will adopt the culture of the dominant group, ie WASPs).

When personal and public values collide

Decent people the world over do their best to live their values and work hard at their jobs while following the laws of the land. But what happens when any those three value systems conflict?
Feministe's Jill, in her post on anti-choice pharmacies sees it this way:
Yes, people absolutely do have a right to object to doing things they find immoral or wrong. And in places where people are legally compelled to be — school, for example
— the law should not force them to do things that violate their conscience. But when you voluntarily accept a job in a particular field, you need to be able to do your job. If you’re a pharmacist, that means you need to fill prescriptions — even if you don’t like the drugs people are taking. If you’re a Scientologist who believes, for example, that it’s wrong to use anti-depressants, and you feel so strongly about that belief that you cannot justify being a part of other peoples’ use of anti-depressants, don’t be a pharmacist. If you’re a member of Fred Phelps’ church and you think AIDS is God’s punishment for homosexuality, and in carrying out that punishment you don’t believe that any HIV-positive people should get medication, don’t be a pharmacist. If you’re a fundamentalist Christian who believes it’s wrong to use birth control, and your belief is that it’s also wrong to allow other people to use birth control, then don’t be a pharmacist.
Which I don't disagree with - that said, one could argue that the individual's right to be a pharmacist WHILE practicing his or her religion trumps the pharmacist's professional code of conduct. Being the agnostic child of American Catholicism and French laicite, I still side with Jill, though.

What about Ethiopian factory workers who want to wear their traditional long skirts and flowing scarves near conveyor belts? That does sound kind of dangerous - but mostly it seems to me that everyone involved (including the authors of the article and comments) is confusing Islam with Ethiopian tradition. Muslims of both sexes are enjoined to dress modestly, but there aren't any more descriptions of skirts, scarves, hijabs and burkas in the Koran than there are pictures of blue jeans and pantsuits in the Bible.

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Importing labor from the former USSR

Just a few weeks ago a guy in my Russian class was commenting that every lifeguard he'd talked to so far this summer was from one of the former Soviet republics - and here's proof! Only in the DC suburbs would you need to import workers from Russia to fill the quintessential teen summer job - don't kids work anymore? And for that matter, aren't there any other locals who would want those jobs?
Clearly, the answer is no, and I see two possible explanations, both of which could very well be true. The first is that there really is a labor shortage in this country (or at least a shortage of unskilled labor) - sorry Lou Dobbs. But even if that's true, why aren't those jobs being taken by the immigrants who are already there?
Like I mentioned earlier, in the American consciousness (or at least in Suburbia) lifeguards are supposed to be white teenagers or young adults. If the ones who are already in the community don't want those jobs, Russia, Moldova and Ukraine seem like great places to get them from. And $7 an hour plus housing seems like fortune to them, even if those wages are in increasingly worthless dollars. This is just a theory though, would love to hear others' thoughts on that.

Americana - prom

This NYT article about senior prom at the International High School in Brooklyn just warmed my heart. I especially love that the girls watched movies to figure out what prom is. What a great acculturation story!

More fun with embedded videos/images... now discuss

Political Picture - Lou Dobbs
see Obama pictures

Friday, June 20, 2008

Nigerian moves to the US, becomes black

Excerpt from a great WaPo article by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie:

I was annoyed the first time an African American man called me "sister." It was in a Brooklyn store, and I had recently arrived from Nigeria, a country where, thanks to the mosquitoes that kept British colonizers from settling, my skin color did not determine my identity, did not limit my dreams or my confidence. And so, although I grew up reading books about the baffling places where black people were treated badly for being black, race remained an exotic abstraction: It was Kunta Kinte.

Until that day in Brooklyn. To be called "sister" was to be black, and blackness was the very bottom of America's pecking order. I did not want to be black.


Angelina Jolie for UNHCR - World Refugee Day

World Refugee Day

In honor of World Refugee Day, rather than posting I am linking to some of the refugee assistance and advocacy community's best blogs and news stories.

World Refugee Day: Where are the world's hidden refugees?

Picture these iconic refugee images - an African woman, holding a child, gazing stoically into the camera against a backdrop of huts and tents in a barren landscape. A long line of people, men, women, and children - again, usually African - on the move with all their worldly possessions on their heads and their backs. An emaciated African child being examined in a clinic by a Western doctor or nurse in a vest with a red cross emblem.

Message by UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres to mark World Refugee Day, 2008

World Refugee Day: In a new exhibition, refugee children photograph their own lives

World Refugee Day: Confronting the Iraq Refugee Crisis

Today nearly five million Iraqis--20% of the population--are displaced. About half of them have fled the country and live as refugees throughout the Middle East, while the rest are displaced within Iraq. Most fled their homes because they felt unsafe; those who worked for the U.S. as translators or drivers fled after they were attacked as collaborators. Most refugees and internally displaced lack access to employment, education and medical care; they are facing shortages of food and money.

World Refugee Day: Reflections from Chad

This Friday, June 20, is World Refugee Day. It is a day to recognize the struggle of some 12 million refugees worldwide who have been forced out of their homes and homelands by fear, conflict, and persecution. It is also an opportunity for many of us to try to appreciate just what it means to have a safe place to go home to, and to remember that no conflict happens in isolation. Insecurity anywhere threatens peace everywhere.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Corporate America vs. the environment

I've recently become a fan of the NYT Shifting Careers blog, and this post in particular (as well as the comments to it) reminded me of a number of things that have been on my mind for a while.
First of all, too many people working in the business world forget that are many kinds of work environments, and that those of us working outside of the corporate world are just as “professional” as they. The type of dress that William et al. advocate (full-on suits for all, and year-round pantyhose for women) is simply not appropriate in many work settings, including schools, non-profits, hospitals, etc. A few weeks ago I was reading an article about the new college graduates entering the workforce. Among other things the survey revealed that on average, members of the class of 2008 expect to earn $48,000 a year in their first job. I laughed and commented that that seemed unrealistic, but my friends (business majors all) thought that was perfectly reasonable - until I pointed out that not everyone is a business major, and not everyone works in the DC/NOVA area. Salaries here, along with the cost of living, are much higher than in many parts of the country. Meanwhile, it seems to me - and I may well be biased here - that 20-somethings working in non-business industries (non-profits, government, education, health care, etc) are well aware that our workplace cultures are not universal and that there are trade-offs involved. One type of organizational culture isn't inherently superior to any other, it's about each worker finding the kind of place that values the same things that the worker him- or herself does.
The other thought I had is that the idea that suits, pantyhose and other weather-inappropriate attire should be worn throughout the summer because AC makes it tolerable is very near-sighted in terms of the environmental damage caused by extreme climate-control. If you’re cold, put on a sweater, and if you’re warm, open the window and wear linen pants. But instead, our instinct seems to be to modify the environment to suit our dress code. Personally I don't see the logic behind expecting professionals in London, New York, DC, Miami and Hong Kong to all dress the same. There are some universal standars - "cover your parts" comes to mind - but requiring pantyhose or suit jackets in the summer in DC is just cruel. In many cultures people aim to live in harmony with nature rather than seeking to control it... just an idea.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Kristof on rape

Thank you, Nick Kristof for your column yesterday about rape as a weapon of war. The one thing missing from Kristof's column and the comments page on his blog is a thorough analysis of the motives behind mass rape. And for good reason: there is no way to conduct a scientific study (with focus groups and all) of guerilla rapists in the Congo. Additionally, the normal response to such evil acts is to condemn the evildoers along with their crimes, not to look them deep in the eyes and ask, how do you feel? why did that seem like a good idea? what's in it for you?
The scariest thing to me about deep evil is that those who commit it are usually convinced that they're doing the right thing - Hitler, Stalin, Mao and gang certainly did, and had a substantial body of literature (to use the term loosely) to back them up. I wonder, what set of beliefs, norms and values - ie, what culture - could make mass rape seem like the right thing to do?
The importance of misogyny can't be understated here - in cultures where women are seen as "less" than men in almost every way, violence against women is a way of life. And if you see your own wife as a piece of property or chattel that you can work, beat or rape as you please, it would follow quite logically that raping and mutilating another man's woman would be akin to painting a graffiti on someone else's house or keying his car.
In any war it's important to keep up your own troops' morale while demoralizing the enemy as much as possible. Raping and pillaging are pillars of that tactic, and if women are seen as property, abusing and destroying them is akin to burning down a house, poisoning a well or gutting a goat. In societies where a family's honor is linked to the sexual purity of its women, as is the case in much of the Muslim world, this is all the more devastating to the men. It's in large part for that reason that male-on-male rape is becoming more common in conflicts around the world.
The existence of a myth that sex with a virgin cures AIDS is well-documented. It's impossible to know how much that factors into the horrors in the DRC, but it's plausible that that would be a factor. I haven't seen The Greatest Silence yet - still working up the courage to watch it - but I remember reading a quote from one of the self-confessed rapists interviewed. The quote said something about how having sex with lots of women was a crucial component of a very powerful magic that brings men strength and courage in battle. Think "eating human flesh will make me invincible," a la Idi Amin, but with rape instead. There is very little literature on this topic, but it's certainly something I would like to learn more about. Finally, it's likely that a number of these soldiers/guerrillas fighters are drugged up - that seldom leads to restraint or humanity.
Before someone accuses me of excessive cultural relativism let me make something clear - rape, torture, mutilation and murder are always wrong. It is always wrong to take complete control over another person and use him or her as an object. But condemning an act or a way of thinking doesn't mean that we shouldn't try to understand the motivations behind the Other's acts.

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Sex with Aunt Flo

I wanted to alert everyone to this very interesting discussion on Aysha's blog about Islam, polygamy, and sex during a woman's period. This is actually a topic that's come up several times recently in conversations with my friends, and the opinions ranged from "it's better during my period" to "it's gross and ain't happening." The most frequent response was "I'm fine with it, but if the guy is grossed out I understand," which I interpret as leaving one's partner free to decline sex for any reason, at any time. I think that's a bare minimum threshold for an honest and respectful relationship.
What I find more interesting (and, as a feminist, more disturbing) is the near-universal link between the female reproductive functions and dirtiness. I don't dispute that menses or childbirth are messy, but why the negative connotations and prohibitions against visiting religious sites, having sex, praying, or interacting with men? There are all sorts of norms like that in Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Native American and surely other traditions. If the reasoning is that women need rest and to be exempt from other obligations during the "womanly times," that's one thing - and I wish American society would respect that more and that lengthy maternity leave was more common. But there's a big difference between giving women the right to rest and to be left alone and prohibiting them from engaging in their lives and communities. It's the difference between an egalitarian society where women are free to determine their needs and how to meet them and a patriarchal ones where women are precious chattel under the benevolent protection of men.

Character flaws

Yesterday afternoon I was half-watching the Russia-Greece match (Euro Cup 2008 is going on) and realized that the players' names were in Roman script - and only Roman script. That makes complete sense in the context of an international event, where the refs and spectators are much more likely to be Roman-script readers. But still, you'd think they would have put the players' names in their own scripts somewhere on the jersey.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Communication

Often, American conversations tend to be a search for information. Americans ask a lot of questions, and they are very direct. Their replies to questions may seem abrupt. They are not cautious about their intent or meaning. For example, if the answer to a request is no, generally Americans will simply reply “No.” They may add a brief explanation as to why they are declining the request, but no does mean no. The answer of no does not mean that it is time to start negotiating. Such a direct answer is done without any sign of embarrassment. It is simply communicating a piece of information.
In the past few days I've been startled by people not taking "no" for an answer - requests for help or information, invitations to parties, one person even refused to accept (from my point of view) that no, I don't have cable.
What Can I Talk About?
One might expect that, in an environment where directness is valued in communication, all topics are appropriate for conversation. That is not really true. Some topics that are generally discussed with acquaintances or those one does not know well:
• The weather
• One’s commuting experience and cars
• Classes and jobs
• Sports
• Music, movies
• Fashion, shopping, and clothes

Topics not to discuss unless you know the people well:
• Money, how much one earns
• Family
• Religion
I would add politics and sex to that list. ESPECIALLY sex - in a town like DC (and with an election around the corner) I don't see how you can avoid politics altogether, but sex is a big taboo in American society. My American friend Jim traveled to France with me last year and was shocked (and slightly horrified) by how freely my relatives discuss sex - though not so much their own sex lives as their theories about the sex lives of celebrities, President Sarkozy and each other. Meanwhile, discussions of money and salary are completely taboo in France. There is a strong sense of shame attached to having money - but that'll be for another day.
Another area that can be confusing is humor. Americans often use humor to make their points or to diffuse uncomfortable situations. Humor frequently relies on shared experiences and understandings that a newcomer may lack. That may lead to misunderstandings. This difficulty exists for Americans, too. They may not understand humor that is clear to you. For example, the subtle British style of humor is often puzzling to Americans. If you think of humor as another form of language, you can relax and realize that, over time, you too will speak this language and share the amusing moments.
I was talking about that with a British acquaintance of mine - she was telling me how much she hates the American version of "The Office," which I think is hilarious. I, on the other hand am amused by the British version but don't find it nearly as funny as she does. In the US puns are seen as a childish form of humor, whereas in France they are considered very witty and one of the highest forms of humor. Asterix et Obelix Mission Cleopatre is a terrific example of French punny humor at its finest. In addition to word plays it's full of clins d'oeil (winks), or a tongue-in-cheek historical or cultural allusion.

As an American in Vietnam


I just read an article in The Economist the other day about how Vietnam was growing like a little dandelion out of the Asian poo hole that it used to be. Hey, that's The Economist's words, not mine (actually, the magazine was much more PC). When I read the article I was like "Hell yeah! You go Vietnam." I mean, call me a veteran-hating, communist bastard all you want, but I seriously became infatuated with Vietnam for the 4 days I visited Hanoi. One reason is that it was my first developing country that I ever visited and it just shocked me. I could understand how the lawlessness and poverty of it all could seem so natural and comforting. No, I don't mean that it comforts me to see poverty and lawlessness.


To begin with, I remember noticing how the roads had no lines and how no one really looked where they were going or at whom they were cutting off, but somehow no one was dying. If that were to happen in the states I'm pretty sure we would all kill each other. Road rage would end America. The horn was just a way to let the person know that they were about to get hit. No one got angry about it; they were actually thankful. Either way, they never looked back. They just turned away from the sound of the horn. If there was more traffic leaving the city (for example) then that side of the road just got bigger and the other side got skinnier. There were not lights at a busy four way intersection. When a side was tired of waiting, they just all teamed up and inched into the intersection to pinch off the flow of traffic, so that they could go.


I remember this vividly because my toes were literally curled the whole ride from the airport to the house. I was white-knuckling the oh-shit handle too. The Heineken I was given didn't relax me at all. I later learned that people actually did get hurt from these methods pretty frequently and occasionally died. That happens everywhere though. Plus, 90% of these people were on scooters, so that equals more pain during collisions.


I had to go to work early the next morning and on the way I saw communism at its best. I'm not kidding. I was loving the fact that everybody and their brother and mother was outside in the parks exercising. The parks were full of people doing odd calisthenics and the sidewalks were full of runners. The whole city wakes up for exercising at 0530 and then goes to work. Hey, I put up with exactly that every day in the Marine Corps and only didn't like it because I couldn't exercise the way I wanted. At least it got me up and got my blood flowing so I could enjoy the day. Hangover days were bad though.


Back on the subject: I was talking to the driver (who was a local) about how everyone there viewed Americans. He told me that they were viewed pretty much the same as most Westerners who traveled there. The newer generations had no real resentment for the war, which they actually call "the American War." The older ones did though. He told me that he thinks that every American hears the word "Vietnam" and thinks "War." I told him that unfortunately he was right.


The place just had a fun feel to it. I went out one night and had a blast with locals and Americans alike. I didn't really take too kindly to finding out that the guy at the Techno club who offered me a couple clove cigarettes was hitting on me. Yeah, no more clove cigs for me, thanks. I met a British cat at that same club who was backpacking through the country. He said he was staying in a hotel and eating three meals a day for about $12 total. He also said that he really enjoyed the people there too. That's about all I remember because he split into two people and starting moving around a bit, so it was hard to focus on him. I think the clover cigarette guy roofy-ed me.

As an American in Vietnam


I just read an article in The Economist the other day about how Vietnam was growing like a little dandelion out of the Asian poo hole that it used to be.  Hey, that's The Economist's words, not mine (actually, the magazine was much more PC).  When I read the article I was like "Hell yeah!  You go Vietnam."  I mean, call me a veteran-hating, communist bastard all you want, but I seriously became infatuated with Vietnam for the 4 days I visited Hanoi.  One reason is that it was my first developing country that I ever visited and it just shocked me.  I could understand how the lawlessness and poverty of it all could seem so natural and comforting.  No, I don't mean that it comforts me to see poverty and lawlessness.  I'm talking about how poor people in these cultures aren't freak shows.  It is just accepted that poverty is a part of life, so they live with it on a more natural level than people from rich countries.  As far as lawlessness, for example, every time I am in a place where seeing a cop is about as common as a seeing a black unicorn, I always feel just as safe as in a country where cops seem to be at every bakery.

To begin with, I remember noticing how the roads had no lines and how no one really looked where they were going or at whom they were cutting off, but somehow no one was dying.  If that were to happen in the states I'm pretty sure we would all kill each other.  Road rage would end America.  The horn was just a way to let the person know that they were about to get hit.  No one got angry about it; they were actually thankful.  Either way, they never looked back.  They just turned away from the sound of the horn.  If there was more traffic leaving the city (for example) then that side of the road just got bigger and the other side got skinnier.  There were not lights at a busy four way intersection.  When a side was tired of waiting, they just all teamed up and inched into the intersection to pinch off the flow of traffic, so that they could go. 

I remember this vividly because my toes were literally curled the whole ride from the airport to the house.  I was white-knuckling the oh-shit handle too.  The Heineken I was given didn't relax me at all. I later learned that people actually did get hurt from these methods pretty frequently and occasionally died.  That happens everywhere though.  Plus, 90% of these people were on scooters, so that equals more pain during collisions.  

I had to go to work early the next morning and on the way I saw communism at its best.  I'm not kidding.  I was loving the fact that everybody and their brother and mother was outside in the parks exercising.  The parks were full of people doing odd calisthenics and the sidewalks were full of runners.  The whole city wakes up for exercising at 0530 and then goes to work.  Hey, I put up with exactly that every day in the Marine Corps and only didn't like it because I couldn't exercise the way I wanted.  At least it got me up and got my blood flowing so I could enjoy the day.  Hang over days were bad though.  

Back on the subject:  I was talking to the driver (who was a local) about how everyone there viewed Americans.  he told me that they were viewed pretty much the same as most Westerners who traveled there.  The newer generations had no real resentment for the war.  The older ones did though.  He told me that he thinks that every American hears the word "Vietnam" and thinks "War."  I told him that unfortunately he was right.  

The place just had a fun feel to it.  I went out one night and had a blast with locals and Americans alike.  I didn't really take to kindly to finding out that the guy at the Techno club who offered me a couple clove cigarettes was hitting on me.  Yeah, no more clove cigs for me, thanks.  I met a British cat at that same club that was backpacking through the country.  He said he was staying in a hotel and eating three meals a day for about $12 per day.  He also said that he really enjoyed the people there too.  That's about all I remember because he split into two people and starting moving around a bit, so it was hard to focus on him.  I think the clover cigarette guy roofy-ed me.  

Yeah, I think I'm just going to end with that.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Time

Although time is simply an idea—an intellectual concept—people talk about time as if it is a commodity. People view time as something that can be saved, spent, used wisely, or wasted. Americans not only speak of time as something tangible but, more importantly, they believe it is scarce. It is considered a valuable but limited resource. “Time is money!” One hears people wishing aloud that they could just add a few hours to the day or another day to each week. Then they could get everything done. “There’s never enough time,” they complain!
Contrast that with the Middle Eastern concept of Insh'Allah:

In šaʾ Allāh (إن شاء الله) is an Arabic term evoked by Arabic, Persian, and Urdu speakers to indicate hope for an aforementioned event to occur in the future. The phrase translates into English as "God willing" or "If it is God's will", sometimes spoken as DV, the Latin abbreviation for Deo volente.

The term is also related to another Arabic term, Mā šāʾ Allāh (ما شاء الله), which means "God has willed it".

This word is often used to indicate a desire to do something that you wish may occur. This also provides God's blessing on what you are about to do. For example, if you want to do something, in particular if you know that it is very hard to achieve, you invoke God's blessing before it occurs or before you set out to do it. In Judaism, B'ezrat Hashem (בעזרת השם), "With God's Help," and Im Yirtze Hashem (אם ירצה השם), "If God wishes it," are used for the same reason.

Usage of Insha'Allah derives from Islamic scripture, Surat Al Kahf (18):24 : "And never say of anything, 'I shall do such and such thing tomorrow. Except (with the saying): 'If God wills!' And remember your lord when you forget..."

In this great piece, Cullen Murphy discusses the term and how the US Army is adopting the concept as a result of the Iraq war:
When worlds collide, the sparks are sometimes linguistic. Not long ago, in a Q and A on the Web site of The New York Times, an Iraqi translator was asked to explain the points of difference he saw between his own people and the Americans he encountered in Iraq. He brought up the Arabic phrase "inshallah." The Americans, he said, "have respect for time"; Iraqis, in contrast, "use the word inshallah, which means `if God wishes,' to postpone things."

It may be that this point of difference won’t be a distinction much longer. An American colonel in Iraq, writing to The Washington Post’s Thomas E. Ricks, recently observed: "The phrase ‘inshallah,’ or ‘God willing,’ has permeated all ranks of the Army. When you talk to U.S. soldiers about the possible success of ‘the surge,’ you’d be surprised how many responded with ‘inshallah.’” The phrase seems to have permeated all ranks of the diplomatic corps, too: Zalmay Khalilzad, when he was the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, once stated at a press conference, “Inshallah, Iraq will succeed.

Americans have a strong sense of agency over the world around them, from our schedules to our careers to creating a new world order. Careful planning and hard work can conquer all, even if love can't. This NYT article is the perfect example of that - two American couples decide that if their sex lives aren't working for them, they're going to have to work for their sex lives.
That they thought a sex marathon would reinvigorate their marriages might say as much about the American penchant for exercise and goal-setting as it does about the state of romance.
I couldn't agree more. I'll have to write later about American-style exercise vs. general physical activity. Insh'Allah.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

As an American in Okinawa

As an American in Okinawa, Japan


When I think of the people from each country that I have lived in or visited I find myself thinking that they are extremely nice to me.  They go out of their way to make this foreigner feel comfortable.  Well, the people in Okinawa, Japan are by far the most genuinely nice that I've met.  They are nice in a different way than any other cultures engage others.  They take intense pride in being kind to others.  From my point of view I was wondering if they wanted if they wanted a tip or something after doing a good deed.  I was just taken aback quite a bit while I was there.  As far as ever leaving a tip for them, say, at a restaurant, forget it.  They take that as an extreme insult and cut your arm off with a katana!  They're that nice.  I'm serious. 

One such story takes place on the day that I was leaving.  The fact that I was in a busy airport and they weren't going to ever see me again is what makes this story so shocking to me.  I got my ticket from Naha, Okinawa to Tokyo and then L.A., but that was it.  The desk clerk told me I would have to have get the rest of my tickets when I landed in the crazy LAX airport.  I wasn't too happy about that because I was still new at flying by myself and LAX is the size of Disneyland, only instead of a princesses, clowns, and some roller coasters rides it has gypsies, con artists, and buses that try to run you down.  I said "Whatev" and went through to catch my flight.  After I took my seat and the doors were about to close, a stewardess found me in my seat and handed me the tickets all the way home to Louisville, Kentucky.  The only thing I think that could have happened is that they saw the disappointment on my face when they originally said they I would have to get the rest of the tickets in LAX.  Wow!  What?  I was dumbfounded.  Up till that point, all I saw from any airport staff was some everyday kindness with the attitude of processing people in and out.  

I have to throw in the fact that I was one of thousands of U.S. Marines occupying the island, as Marines have since WWII.  The Okinawans have dealt with the good, bad, and the ugly of us over the 6 decades that we were there.  The whole time I was there I was only directly shunned once.  That was the time I was kicked out as soon as I entered a photo shop right outside of Camp Hansen.  The man gingerly came out of the back room and got meaner than a hippo on her period when he saw that it was an American.  It was scary.  I later found out that he had problems with Marines getting stupid in his store and supposedly he was close to one of the young girls who was raped on the island a couple years earlier.  

Dating was very difficult for me there.  For one, I just don't have game.  For two, I was 19 years old and it seemed like every girl I met at a club looked 18, but was actually 28 (even after a year I could never guess a girl's age there, so I went around assuming everyone was 10 years older than what I thought).  For three, how do you read someone who has almost no expression on their face most of the time and rarely ever looks you in the eye?  I will say though, that they still showed utmost kindness even while being awkwardly approached by an insecure skinny round-eyed boy.  Kudos to them.  Luckily for me there was a naval and an air force base on the island with equally insecure round-eye girls.

Food there took a little getting used to because it was... you know... healthy.  If I wanted to cheat and go to the JapDonald's then I was going to pay $3 for a hamburger almost as small as a White Castle.  It was a benefit in disguise.  These Okinawans live the longest of anyone in the world for a reason.  They live healthy; especially the older generation, which is a pretty old generation.  I saw or heard of so many people over the century mark or close to it.  The wouldn't hesitate to tell you that its not good for you to smoke or eat McShit.  They said Wendy's was cool to eat though (not really, but I gotta give props to the fresh patty place I love).  Most of them were still practicing some form of martial arts or yoga.  Just being around them made me feel like I knew absolutely nothing about how life should be lived.    Oh, and I keep calling them Okinawans instead of Japanese because they are about as Japanese as Hawaiians are American.  Okinawans might be  Japanese, but they have a separate set of traditions and culture.  

Overall, I would say that Okinawans would love to have their whole island back, but I only saw a couple instances of rudeness towards us Americans while I was there.  The air there was made up of pride, respect, and peace.  This was in a place where people were stacked on top of each other, it was ok to pee outside (if you were drunk outside of a bar), they served saké from a jar with an entire dead snake in it, they have sweet potato ice cream,  and there is a spectacular banana show (that you must see).  


All joking aside, this is one place that I wish I could have appreciated more while I was there and I would recommend anyone to go.  I'm basing this off of the fact that the people make the place.


SAYONARA


Introduction to American Life

My first reaction upon finding this booklet for international students was intellectual delight - what a great ressource for other visitors and immigrants! Funded by the State Department and written by NAFSA - Association of International Educators (no idea how they figure that acronym), it has sections on time, communication, status and hierarchy, the rule of law, regional diversity in the US, and relationships with family and friends. My second reaction was more an aha! moment - way to be a low-context culture, USA!
Americans like to have as much information as possible upfront. We like how-to guides, instructions manuals, detailed contracts with plans for every conceivable contingency, agendas, menus, and syllabi. We like to know ahead of time what's going to happen, and the transfer of information needs to be very explicit (as opposed to reliant on people picking up on social cues).

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Guess I hit a nerve... or was that the Potomac?

When I blogged about some of the factors that lead 20-somethings to choose living in the District or in NOVA, I thought I was just adding an interculturalist perspective to a pretty well-established fact - that people do all sorts of things for all sorts of reasons, including deciding where to live based on what kind of environment feels "right." In turn, those feelings can be based on cultural preferences formed in childhood that can be difficult to break. I've lived in apartments for most of my life, and to this day I intensely dislike being alone in a single-family home, especially at night, and even more so if there's a thunderstorm. I also know lots of people who cannot bring themselves to think of an apartment or condo as a real home, because a real home to them is a single-family home with a yard and a driveway. There's nothing wrong with either perspective, in fact it adds to the richness of life.
So why are so many people commenting on that, and primarily arguing for why their residential choice is the best, more rational one? I'm sure the mention on DCBlogs had something to do with it, but I doubt that's the whole story. It's a very concrete topic, for one. Additionally, intercultural studies as an academic discipline tends to make a lot of people uncomfortable. Political correctness is all about what unites us, whereas interculturalism by necessity looks at the less-obvious things that divide us. For that reason it's tempting to sweep it all under the rug - if you ignore it long enough, maybe it will go away! But talking about differences is the only way to reach across them. So keep on commenting and challenging us to refine our arguments, just keep it polite. R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

American Culture

Whenever I do a training about intercultural communication, there are always a few people who introduce themselves as "American... whatever that means," or "I'm American... so I guess I don't really have a culture." Likewise, one of the most common critiques of the US that I hear from Europeans is that "there's no culture in America." In French that comes out as "les americains n'ont pas de culture," which is very similar in meaning to "les americains ne sont pas cultives" - which in the French context (and especially among the Parisian bourgeoisie) means that Americans don't know and appreciate the same things as the French upper classes (who as everyone knows have a monopoly on taste and refinement - c'est evident!)

It's a common adage in the IC world that you don't really understand your own culture until you step out of it and into another one. That said, I've found that training materials intended for immigrants or other newcomers can be a great resource for someone interested in understanding his own culture more thoroughly. I spend a lot of time reading and thinking about idiosyncracies of French and American cultures, and I find that this increased self-awareness helps me be more effective in all of my interpersonal relationships. As a bicultural person all of my interactions necessarily have an intercultural dimension (especially considering the company I keep!).

Over the coming weeks I plan to look at various aspects of American culture from the interculturalist perspective - if anyone has specific questions please leave those as a comment to this post... stay tuned!

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Hymen reconstruction debacle grips France

Gynecologists report that in the past few years, more Muslim women are asking for certificates of virginity to provide proof to others. That in turn has created a demand among cosmetic surgeons for hymen replacements, which, if done properly, they say, will not be detected and will produce tell-tale vaginal bleeding on the wedding night. The service is widely advertised on the Internet; medical tourism packages are available to countries like Tunisia where it is less expensive.
And even more baffling...
The groom, an engineer, applied for an annulment because his bride, a student nurse, had lied to him about her virginity. Under the French civil code, an annulment can be granted “if there was a mistake about the person or the essential qualities of the person”. The judge declared the marriage void since it was “founded on a lie about her virginity”, which the bride acknowledged, and this constituted an “essential quality” in the eyes of both parties. The bride did not contest the annulment.
1) Women should have the right to pay for whatever ridiculous surgeries they want
2) Women should not be pressured into having ridiculous surgeries
3) Since it's well-established that all sorts of things can lead to the hymen rupturing, why is the presumption that a hymen-less woman isn't a virgin?
4) What's so great about virginity, anyway? Thanks to birth control and paternity tests, men don't have to worry so much about being duped into raising kids who aren't their own. And fears of STDs go both ways. If anything women should be more concerned, given the number of STIs that don't have any symptoms in men but can really mess up a woman's reproductive system.
5) In the case of the woman whose fiance's conservative Moroccan family wants their family friend to examine her, isn't that a form of assault? You better believe that no one looks at my lady parts without a good medical or romantic reason. And there's no way I'd marry anyone who tells me otherwise.
6) If you can't trust a woman to tell you the truth about her virginity and need so much proof, how can you trust her to be your wife? Or, why marry someone you don't trust?
7) Thats a LOT of money to pay for something whose sole purpose is to be examined once or twice and then broken. Kind of like a Jewish bride buying a fine crystal glass just to have the groom stomp on it.

So what does French public opinion have to say? That the husband in the Lille case was too young (23) to be taken seriously, that his virginity fetish was a throw-back to the Middle Ages (regardless of his religion), and that doctors and judges who go along with this sort of thing are complicit to the oppression of women. I don't disagree with Halimi on any of those points, a priori, but I think there's probably more nuance to be found. I'd love to see articles written from either the husband or the wife's perspective, rather than from the perspective of a detached observer.

His & Hers - Nature or Nurture?

I've never been married nor lived with anyone, but I definitely agree with the generalizations about heterosexual relationships described in this NYT article. Both the data and anecdotal evidence from my coworkers, mentors and other couples I know strongly support the idea that women do the brunt of the housework, men make more money (and if they don't, they wish they did), she wants to talk more and he wants sex (I'm guessing a bit on those last two). Even when both partners say they want an egalitarian relationship, more often than not it just doesn't happen, and I think it boils down to deep-rooted expectations of who little boys and girls should grow up to be. As theoretically egalitarian as I am, I expect myself to cook and keep house well, and my guy friends tell me that they expect themselves to earn enough to support their eventual wife and kids - whether or not your partner actually expects that of you. There's also an element of "gee-wouldn't-it-be-nice if I could afford to stay home with the (theoretical) baby for a year or two", or "if the brilliant, talented woman I marry also happens to be a gourmet chef with Penelope Cruz's looks."
it's good to know that it isn't necessarily biologically-based. It's also reassuring that in my experience marriages get more egalitarian with each generation. My parents' marriage was more egalitarian than either of my sets of grandparents', and I'm much more comfortable with the idea of an egalitarian relationship than my parents are. For example, my dad thinks I should clean my apartment more thoroughly to get in the habit before I have a mother-in-law (who will judge mu suitability as a wife and mother based on that), and my mom thinks it's improper to call boys on the telephone - apparently that's "brassy". Oh and if anyone who speaks "Mom" can tell me what "brassy" means, that would be great.

in defense of the city

I'd like to go back and address some things from this earlier post-

First of all, I hate driving or walking in NoVa. There is no rhyme or reason to the streets, you just have to know what goes where. In defense of Virgina however, it's like that in most cities- including my hometown in North Carolina, and in suburban Maryland, where I grew up.

As for suburbia- it never ceases to amaze me when I travel how anti-suburb I've become. On a business trip to Atlanta, I think I ended up with reverse claustrophobia (agoraphobia?) because everything is SO spread out. There's no density, you have to drive everywhere- it's just insane. I can't imagine living like that. Walking and taking public transportation force you to become more involved and have a greater stake in your community- after all, you're constantly interacting with your neighbors. You learn who belongs, and who's a new face. And you meet far more people than you would sitting in traffic on I-66.

In terms of safety, I'd like to make the argument that walking and taking public transportation can make you more safe than driving. In walking around my neighborhood, I've gotten to know what things are supposed to be like- the homeless man always hangs out in front of Starbucks on 13th and U, the mom and her kid that are always on the 8:25 54 bus downtown, the lovely Italian gentleman who always hangs out in front of his restaurant, welcoming people in, the girls double-dutching in the street that live two doors down, the other group house on the end of the block, etc. It's much easier for me to spot things that are out of the ordinary, because I have a good sense of who comes and goes and the rhythms of my neighborhood that I would if my walk home consisted of a five second jaunt from my car to my door. In my jaunts around my neighborhood, I've even gotten to know my local police officer. I guarantee that wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for my wanderings (granted, that might say something about effective neighborhood policing, but that's for another time). I have several friends in the neighborhood- I run into them walking to work or to dinner or to the gym. Being in a car all the time doesn't facilitate that sort of interaction.

Now, I'm not slamming car culture....well, maybe I am. Here, in the greater DC area, it's not necessary. It hurts far more than it helps. Many of the things that people complain about in DC would go a long way towards being fixed if people took more of an active interest in their neighborhoods, instead of merely viewing them as some place to park a car and sleep at night.

The safety issue brings up something else for me- as it gets warmer, I find myself being catcalled a LOT more. It's irritating and upsets me because I know if I wear a skirt or a cute dress (hell, or gym shorts and a tank top), whistles, stopped cars, and all that other crap will ensue. It's enough to make me want to change clothes before I walk out of my door sometimes. At the same time, it's my neighborhood, and I flat-out refuse to be made to feel uncomfortable in it. In much the same way that a few ill-mannered assholes won't make me change my clothes, I'd like to think I won't let them drive me to isolate myself in a car either.

I've been in DC proper for almost six years (and another six in PG County). In that time, I've lived in AU Park, Cleveland Park, Eastern Market, and the Southwest Waterfront. I can honestly say this is my current neighborhood is the best place I've lived so far.

And for what it's worth, I live on the green line :)

On stuff people like

So, I know I'm a little late to get on the "Stuff White People Like" etc. bandwagon (speaking of which - it really should be called "Stuff Yuppies Like" but whatev) - but I have to admit I'm really fascinated by those sites (I think my favorite might be Stuff Korean Moms Like). There's a fine, fine line between culturally useful generalization and negative stereotyping, and in a lot of ways these sites are really toeing the line. Nevertheless, I think identifying artifacts and customs that are typical of a certain group can be a useful (and entertaining!) window into that culture or subculture's norms and values.
If you scroll down this page, the right-hand sidebar now features a blog roll dedicated to Stuff People Like - if there are other similar sites out there that I'm missing, please send them my way!

As an aside - thanks for the mention, DCBlog!

Monday, June 9, 2008

"What you need" vs. "what you can get"

When my dad came to visit last April we spent a lot of time talking about culture, and especially about French and American cultures, and where I fit on that spectrum. An interculturalist himself, Papa has always been a champion of my right to be as bicultural as I damn well please.
Anyway, one of the big themes we discovered was the French preference for "what you need" and the American tendency to go for "what you can get." Concretely, that means that the average Frenchman will "settle" (from an American perspective) for the simplest apartment, car or gadget that will fulfill his basic needs. Anything more "ne sert a rien" (serves no purpose). Meanwhile, his American counterpart will add on as many options as he can delude himself into thinking he can afford, sacrificing his credit rating, free time, and family life in the process (at least that's how Jean-Pierre over in Frogland would see it).
Take the example of automobiles. Americans are more likely to buy newer, larger vehicles with many more options than Europeans (and certainly than a Frog). Meanwhile, the Dacia Logan, which Renault initially intended for emerging markets, is one of the most popular cars in France even as its winning over India, Russia, China and Mexico.

Sunday, June 8, 2008

The city life vs. suburbia

At dinner last night KT and I were talking about the cultural gulf between Suburbians and city people. In the DC area especially there is a clear distinction between the District people and NoVa folks, and what is especially interesting to me is the rhetoric of fear on both sides. Take my friend Lo, for example. Lo is a nice Midwestern girl who moved to DC for college and never really looked back. For the past two years she's been living in a run down converted 1-bedroom in Eastern Market with two roommates. Lo walks to her job near Capitol Hill, takes the metro and buses when she ventures further than that, and knows the bartenders at most of the neighborhood pubs and dive bars around DC. On the rare occasions when she ventures over to Virginia, she'll tell anyone who will listen that NoVa is scary - the manicured lawns, picture-perfect yuppiness a mask that surely must hide a far more sinister truth. In the District things might not always be pretty, but they're honest, and real.
And then there's Christy. Christy is from a Northern New Jersey suburb, and six years after moving to DC she holds on to that frame of reference as the kind of community where everyone should live, or at least want to live.
These days she lives in Arlington, in a luxurious high-rise with a private swimming pool, a parking garage, and all the amenities you can imagine. She lives two blocks away from the metro station, but drives everywhere both for convenience and because she is very safety-conscious. As a single woman coming home alone, she doesn't feel comfortable outside the protective shell of her car. She comes into the District to socialize at high-end restaurants and clubs and knows exactly whom to email to get onto the guest lists for the hottest parties. Her RA in college once told her that the Green Line was unsafe, and she would never tempt fate by venturing into Columbia Heights. Why subject yourself to the dirtiness of the city when everything is so much nicer in NoVa? It'll be interesting to see what Christy and others like her do when Tyson's Corner eventually becomes more urbanized.
I'm trying to be as objective as possible as I write this, but I have to admit that I'm with Lo on this one. I live in Midcity, that newly-designated buffer zone between Dupont and Logan Circle, largely because when I moved in three years ago it was the best I could afford and as 20-year-old living alone for the first time, I was much more concerned with safety than I am now - or rather, the past three years have ingrained in me an appreciation for the glorious grit of less gentrified neighborhoods like Eastern Market, Columbia Heights, Capitol Hill or NoMa (which I hear is "the next next next U street," whatever that means).
So what is it about the city that feels so right to me? For one thing, my frame of reference is Bourg-la-Reine, a comparatively sleepy suburb of Paris which looks more like residential parts of DC than anything else. It would feel wrong to not have sidewalks overflowing with people of all ages, occupations and colors, and to have anything but my feet and maybe my bike be my main mode of transportation. By age 12 I had the routes and schedules of most of my area's bus lines memorized, and at 13 my friends and I would take the subway into town to picnic in the Jardin du Luxembourg. As a sidenote, I don't get the uproar about letting a 9-year-old ride the subway alone - my parents did similar things to me and considered it a safety exercice.
A major reason people choose to live in Suburbia is that cheaper real estate means you can afford a bigger place. Until I was 14 my parents, brother and I lived in a 1,000 sq ft (100 m2), three-bedroom apartment and it never occurred to me that this could be considered small. Today I live in a 400 sq ft (40 m2) studio with my cat - which I consider perfectly adequate, my Kentucky relatives think is tiny, and my father thinks is huge. Go figure. A French developer would have made two studios out of this space, and young French singles would stand in line to rent them... which actually makes me think of another Froggie vs. Yankee difference - "what you need" vs. "what you can get." But that's for another time.

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Islamic finance making headway in the US

I'd be interested to hear whether it is the charging of interest or paying interest that is theologically haraam. In Medieval Europe the Church frowned upon moneylenders (cf. The New Testament), and this is actually how so many Jewish families (cf. The Rothschilds) became involved in banking.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Imagine no countries

The restrictionist message is brutally simple — that illegal immigrants deserve no rights, mercy or hope. It refuses to recognize that illegality is not an identity; it is a status that can be mended by making reparations and resuming a lawful life.

Borders and nationalities are socio-political constructs; they have no more basis in reality nor legitimacy than the dehumanizing ideologies of race that have allowed the haves to subjugate the have-nots throughout human history. At its worst, this way of thinking led Man to his darkest hours by justifying mass atrocities like the decimation of Native Americans, slavery, the Holocaust, and the Rwandan genocide. Gold stars in Nazi Germany, special pink birth certificates in the Dominican Republic, the Burmese junta's reluctance to allow Western aid workers into the Irawaddy Delta, and American immigration policy all serve to isolate the us from the them, to deny our shared humanity in service of the political and economic interests of those in power.
The US government and American mainstream culture is quick to cry wolf in defense of state sovereignty when it's convenient, forgetting about the times when it was in our interest to ignore it: the Mexican-American War then, the invasion of Iraq now.

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

RIP, Irena Sendler - and a tribute to my grandparents

Like many social workers in pre-war Poland, Mrs Sendler belonged to the Socialist Party: not for its political ideology, but because it combined compassion with dislike of money-worship.
I think this sentence encapsulates the soul of European socialism. Though my American-educated, Cartesian mind believes in the logic of market economics and free trade, my heart is true to its French roots. My grandparents worshiped two institutions with equal degrees of veneration: the Public School and the Catholic Church, and instilled in their children (and later, my cousins and me) the sacrosanct values of education and compassion.

Monday, June 2, 2008

우리 어머니~~our mother

A blog that answers the age-old important question: What would it be like to have a Korean mother?

http://stuffkoreanmomslike.blogspot.com/

I have many entries in the pipeline. Coming soon!

As an American in Ougadougou

General consensus, without beating around the bush, I feel like I am viewed as nice person with lots of money to most people in Ouagadougou.  However, in this case, if the word "viewed" was a country (if I may) then it would be Canada: peaceful and loved by all.  I should change the word "viewed" to a more targeted and edgy country such as, well, America.  I feel like I walk around with a huge, red, flashing, neon light above my noggin.  Sometimes I don't want to leave my apartment because of it.  I wouldn't take to being famous very well.  If I were Britney Spears, who has it 100x worse than I do, I would probably end up like, um... like Michael Jackson I guess.  Either that or fake my death like Tupac.

After talking to a few locals and just walking around and getting a feel for the people, I feel like they genuinely like me.  Money aside, they are mostly just intrigued by me.  America is the melting pot, but this place is pretty much all one race.  Even living back home in the east end of Louisville, KY (predominately white), if I see a brotha or sista walking down the street they stick out to me.  In cities like D.C., I couldn't even tell you who is white, black, latino, or M.I.B. agents.  Race is less apparent because of the constant mixture of people.  Living here gives you a feeling like you don't belong, but you are welcome to stay.  Here's an example that everyone can relate to:  Imagine you were back in your gangster days (some of you OG's out there don't have to imagine. Do you?  'cause you're still a G), and you walk through Crip territory wearing a Chicago Bulls Jersey with matching red shorts, a Red Sox hat, and you're blushing.  As you pimp-limp from corner to corner you can feel all eyes on you.  You're on the wrong side of the orchard and everyone knows it.  You accidentally bump into someone and the world stops turning because you see them reach into their pocket.  Unexpectedly, they all laugh, comment on the new silly color in their neighborhood, ask if you're lost or need help, and then give you a slice of a mango.  I can't really explain the feeling any better than that.

I was telling my buddy Moses last night how I felt like I stood out so much and I thought it was because of my skin and money.  He pretty much confirmed it and added that some people call him boss because he rides a scooter and they only have a bicycle to ride, donkey cart, or maybe ride nothing.  Can you picture a person riding nothing?  No.  You can't.  Because you can't see nothing.  

Congo told me that he was a big fan of Americans over Europeans and especially French.  Definitely not grinning ear to ear from my flag-waving pride,  I asked him him why?  First, he talked about how the French were difficult and lazy.  He said Americans were easier to get along with.  I told him how the nicest people that I met in my Eurotrip were french, but they definitely are not known to be workaholics.  Second, he told me that he loved the idea of the freedom to work as much as you want, creating as much wealth as you wanted.  This also comes from a guy whose career goal is to work six 12-hour days for the rest of his life.  

The down side is that I do get the occasional guy mean-mugging me.  I haven't figured that out yet, so I chalk it up to too much Haterade for those guys.  Also, its a given that with the bartering system in place here that the salesman/saleslady will hike the price up sometimes up to 8 times the amount the item should be sold.  Also, most don't mind selling it too me even though they know its a p.o.s.  

In closing, living like a mini-Britney Spears is kinda nice.  I haven't shown my crotch though because I haven't lost my mind or class, yet.  Oh, and its a good feeling to be an American in Ouagadougou. 


OUT